How Randoli compares.
Every comparison starts from the same architecture: local processing, $0 ingestion, OpenTelemetry-native. Here's how that plays out against each alternative.
Same signals, a structurally different bill. $0 ingestion vs. per-host and per-GB pricing.
No per-seat tax. Flat per-host pricing instead of data plus per-user seats.
No unit math. One flat rate instead of DPS units across host, log, and DEM.
Both OTel-native. Only one of us doesn't bill you for data volume.
Same open-source stack, run locally instead of hosted and metered.
Keep your stack. Add correlation, monitors, and an AI agent on top of it.
Cost as a signal, already correlated with the incident that caused it.
Fairer streaming pricing is still volume-based. Local processing removes the axis.
Same OTel-native, self-hosted ground, plus cost, security, and an AI agent.
Application errors as one signal in a broader platform: metrics, logs, traces, cost, security.
Great for exploring an event. Randoli covers the cluster it ran on, at a flat rate.
Real-time log monitoring, without the per-GB indexing bill.